The Aftershock Project: You Don’t Release the Past. You Change Your Relationship to It
- Sue Oatley (was Knight)
- Feb 25
- 3 min read
I’m going on retreat soon.
And before I go, I found myself wondering:
Is there anything more I can do to release my past?
It sounds noble, doesn’t it? Clean. Evolutionary. Growth-oriented.
Release the past. Heal it. Clear it. Be free of it.
But the more I sit with that question, the more I notice something subtle hiding inside it.
When I say “release,” what do I actually mean?
Do I mean:
Stop feeling it? Stop carrying the physiological imprint? Stop reacting in familiar ways? Stop the old tightening in my chest and shoulder? Stop the grief that still flickers?
If I’m honest, there’s a part of me that wants to be done.
Done with the residue. Done with the patterns. Done with the nervous system remembering.
And that part makes sense.
But I’m not sure “release” is the right word.
Release as Erasure
Sometimes we imagine healing as deletion.
If I meditate enough. If I understand attachment deeply enough. If I regulate my nervous system skilfully enough. If I finally “integrate” it all.
Then it won’t come up anymore.
But that’s erasure.
And erasure is a control project.
The body doesn’t delete what it learned in order to survive. It doesn’t uninstall childhood. It doesn’t remove the imprint of vigilance or tenderness or rupture.
Those pathways exist.
What changes is not whether they arise.
What changes is whether I contract around them.
The Past Will Still Arise, That’s the Aftershock
A memory appears. The chest tightens. A subtle bracing.
Before, it felt like:
What’s wrong with me?
If I’m honest, at times, I still get caught there sometimes.
But now, it can often feel more like:
Ah. This is remembering.
That difference matters.
One collapses identity into the memory. The other witnesses it as experience moving through awareness.
The past arising is not the problem.
Clinging to it, or trying to push it away, is where suffering builds.
Freedom Is Not Absence
This has been a quiet realisation over many years, and I am still learning.
Freedom isn’t the absence of activation. It isn’t a permanently regulated nervous system. It isn’t a life without old feelings.
It’s this:
Grief arises. It is known. It passes.
Fear arises. It is known. It passes.
Memory arises. It is known. It passes.
Without the extra layer of:
“Why am I still like this?”“After all this work…”“I should be further along.”
That second tightening, that’s the real bind.
Still Practising With the Aftershocks
I’ve come to accept the aftershocks are part of my life.
That feels important to say.
Not as confession. Not as defeat. But as truth.
The aftershock is not the problem. It’s the shame and silence around it that keep it hidden.
And sometimes there is shame.
Shame that, after all this practice, reflection and training and retreats, something still tightens. Shame that reverberation still moves through a body that understands the theory. Shame that I am not entirely untouched.
But perhaps the deepest layer is this:
The shame of admitting they are there at all.
Because I was shaped by a culture that did not name its aftershocks.
A culture of service. Of composure. Of getting on with it. Of not making it about you. Of quiet containment.
In that landscape, shockwaves are not discussed. They are absorbed.
So to say, “I still feel reverberation,” can feel like a betrayal of strength.
But maybe it is not weakness to admit the ground still moves.
Maybe it is honesty.
The real shift is not eliminating the aftershocks.
Maybe, it is removing the shame around them.




Comments